Exposing the Obama Deep State’s Treasonous Coup Against Trump
John Durham spent 4 years and $10 million investigating the phony Russian collusion hoax, and all he found was one low-level FBI attorney changing an email for a warrant.
In less than 6 months, Tulsi Gabbard has uncovered a conspiracy to overturn the 2016 election by Obama. pic.twitter.com/KdZezylzRp— Vince Langman (@LangmanVince) July 20, 2025
The Smoking Gun: Obama’s Crew Caught Red-Handed
On December 7, 2016, talking points for then-DNI James Clapper stated, “Foreign adversaries did not use cyberattacks on election infrastructure to alter the US Presidential election outcome.” A December 8, 2016, Presidential Daily Brief, prepared by the CIA, FBI, NSA, and others, confirmed Russian and criminal actors “did not impact recent US election results” through hacking. Yet, on December 9, 2016, Obama’s inner circle—including Clapper, CIA Director John Brennan, FBI Director James Comey, National Security Adviser Susan Rice, Secretary of State John Kerry, and Attorney General Loretta Lynch—met to discuss Russia. Hours later, leaks to The Washington Post falsely claimed Russia used “cyber means” to sway the election for Trump. By January 6, 2017, a new Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) contradicted prior findings, alleging Russia’s intent to boost Trump, leaning heavily on the discredited Steele Dossier—funded by Clinton’s campaign and packed with unverified gossip.
Tulsi says that since she released the Russiagate docs to the DOJ, whistleblowers are coming out of the woodwork.
Apparently, they were afraid to speak out under the previous administration. pic.twitter.com/Iug56iMXCh
— David Joe May (@TheGrayRider) July 20, 2025
This was no mistake. Gabbard’s memo, titled “The Russia Hoax,” calls it a deliberate effort to “subvert the will of the American people” and enact a “years-long coup.” The Steele Dossier, a 35-page pile of Kremlin fan fiction, was pushed by Brennan into the 2017 ICA despite CIA consensus it was “internet rumor,” per a July 18, 2025, Fox News report. A DNI whistleblower refused to concur that Russia decisively favored Trump, citing manipulated data. This politicized intelligence sparked the Mueller investigation (2017-2019), which found no Trump-Russia conspiracy but cost taxpayers $32 million and jailed Trump allies like Michael Flynn.
The Deep State Rogues’ Gallery
Trump amplified Gabbard’s findings on Truth Social on July 19, 2025, calling her team “fantastic” for exposing Obama’s “thugs” and their “highest level Election Fraud.” White House deputy press secretary Harrison Fields, on Fox News, branded Obama’s presidency “the most corrupt we’ve ever seen.” General Michael Flynn, on X on July 19, 2025, called Gabbard’s move “surreal” and a “checkmate” against the deep state. These are patriots fighting a cabal that weaponized the FBI, CIA, and DNI against a duly elected president.
Democrat Deflection and the Epstein Distraction
Democrats are scrambling to spin this as a Trump vendetta. On July 18, 2025, Representative Jim Himes called Gabbard’s claims “baseless,” pointing to a 2020 Senate Intelligence Committee report—led by Republicans like Marco Rubio—that confirmed Russia’s 2016 interference to aid Trump via social media and DNC leaks. Senator Mark Warner, on July 19, 2025, accused Gabbard of “weaponizing” her role to “rewrite history.” They claim the Obama-era ICA never alleged vote tampering, only influence operations, and Gabbard’s conflating the two. A 2019 Mueller report found Russia meddled “in sweeping and systematic fashion” but cleared Trump’s campaign of coordination. Democrats also note the timing—Gabbard’s release came amid Trump’s heat over Jeffrey Epstein file disclosures, suggesting it’s a distraction.
Nice try, but the evidence doesn’t lie. Gabbard’s documents show a clear pivot from “no Russian impact” to a hyped-up narrative post-election, driven by leaks and a dodgy dossier. The Senate report, while bipartisan, didn’t probe Obama’s inner circle’s actions, and Mueller’s failure to find collusion only underscores the hoax’s flimsiness. The Epstein angle? A convenient dodge to deflect from Obama’s crew getting exposed. America First patriots see through this—Himes and Warner are protecting their swamp buddies, not the truth.
Why It Matters: The Republic on the Line
This isn’t just about 2016; it’s about 2025 and beyond. Gabbard’s July 18, 2025, referral to the DOJ, backed by Attorney General Pam Bondi, signals Trump’s team is playing hardball. The FBI’s ongoing probes into Brennan and Comey, sparked by Ratcliffe’s June 2025 review, could lead to perjury charges, and Gabbard’s evidence ups the ante for broader indictments. Her July 20, 2025, Fox News appearance promised more files this week, potentially exposing deeper corruption. For regular Americans, this is a fight for the republic’s soul. The deep state’s power grab—smearing Trump, jacking up U.S.-Russia tensions, and wasting $32 million on a witch hunt—stole trust in our elections. A July 2024 Rasmussen Reports poll showed 62% of Americans distrust federal agencies, and Gabbard’s move is a step toward draining that swamp.
But there’s a hitch. Gabbard’s credibility took a hit after Trump rebuked her on June 20, 2025, over her Iran nuclear stance, calling her “wrong” on Air Force One. Her March 2025 testimony downplayed Iran’s nuclear threat, clashing with Trump’s hawkish line, and sparked talk of her ouster. Yet, Vice President JD Vance and allies like Flynn rallied behind her, and her July 18 bombshell shows she’s still in the fight. Critics like Warner question her motives, citing her lack of intelligence experience and past pro-Russia remarks, but her document dump speaks louder than their whining.
